Mailing List Archive

Re: Flagged revs and Lua modules
Please can anyone help to solve this issue? It causes a lot of extra work,
thousands of unchecked pages.

2013/3/18 Bináris <wikiposta@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> I don't know if there is a bugreport on this, forgive me if I duplicate.
>
> Hungarian Wikipedia began to use Scribunto in the first batch, and we also
> use Flagged Revisions.
> This is a page:
> http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3&action=history
> where the editors were all trusted and/or bots, but the page had to be
> explicitliy checked. The behaviour is just like when a template is modified
> by untrusted user, and we have to check the articles where it is included.
> But in this case it is not the template but a module.
> All these pages
> http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Mi_hivatkozik_erre/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul
> have the same problem.
> On the other side, the history of the involved module:
> http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul shows that it was only
> edited by an admin and should be autochecked (or reviewed or patrollod or
> anything because I always mix these words in English but uselang=en shows
> checked).
>
> --
> Bináris




--
Bináris
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: Flagged revs and Lua modules [ In reply to ]
Hi Bináris,

Could you file a bug report for this? I think I might be able to
tease out what the bug is from your email, but it would be a lot
better if you could document what the expected behavior is, and what
the actual behavior is.

Here's my attempt to describe the problem, but I don't want to file it
because I'm not sure I've got it right:
"""""
Subject: Lua modules don't get autochecked by FlaggedRevs when they should be

On Hungarian Wikipedia, we use FlaggedRevs and Scribunto. Lua modules
seem to require manual checking on this wiki, even in cases that where
the user (such as an admin) should have had their edit autochecked

Example page where this happened:
http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3&action=history

Repro steps:
1. Edit a Lua module as a user with autocheck rights
2. View the FlaggedRevs status of that page

Expected behavior: the revised Lua module becomes the new checked
version of the page
Actual behavior: the unrevised Lua module remains the checked version
until someone checks the latest revision

"""""
Is that an accurate description of the problem? Is that the only
problem, or are there multiple problems? If this is correct, could
you file this as a bug?

Rob

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bináris <wikiposta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please can anyone help to solve this issue? It causes a lot of extra work,
> thousands of unchecked pages.
>
> 2013/3/18 Bináris <wikiposta@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if there is a bugreport on this, forgive me if I duplicate.
>>
>> Hungarian Wikipedia began to use Scribunto in the first batch, and we also
>> use Flagged Revisions.
>> This is a page:
>> http://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abe_Sinz%C3%B3&action=history
>> where the editors were all trusted and/or bots, but the page had to be
>> explicitliy checked. The behaviour is just like when a template is modified
>> by untrusted user, and we have to check the articles where it is included.
>> But in this case it is not the template but a module.
>> All these pages
>> http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speci%C3%A1lis:Mi_hivatkozik_erre/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul
>> have the same problem.
>> On the other side, the history of the involved module:
>> http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modul:Nyelvtani_modul shows that it was only
>> edited by an admin and should be autochecked (or reviewed or patrollod or
>> anything because I always mix these words in English but uselang=en shows
>> checked).
>>
>> --
>> Bináris
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bináris
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: Flagged revs and Lua modules [ In reply to ]
Sounds like a site config issue. All wikis that have NS_TEMPLATE in
$wgFlaggedRevsNamespaces should also have NS_MODULE in there.



--
View this message in context: http://wikimedia.7.n6.nabble.com/Flagged-revs-and-Lua-modules-tp4999685p4999997.html
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l