Mailing List Archive

omudpspoof configuration directives need OM prefix or not?
The page documenting omudpspoof is inconsistent. The configuration directives suggest to use OM prefix for everything except the port, while the examples don't use the prefix at all.

http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/omudpspoof.html

If this changed in a given version, it would be good to indicate this.

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
Re: omudpspoof configuration directives need OM prefix or not? [ In reply to ]
FWIW with 5.8 the OM prefix is required and those examples are wrong.

On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> The page documenting omudpspoof is inconsistent. The configuration directives suggest to use OM prefix for everything except the port, while the examples don't use the prefix at all.
>
> http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/omudpspoof.html
>
> If this changed in a given version, it would be good to indicate this.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
>
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards