Mailing List Archive

1 2 3 4  View All
Re: Mx204 alternative [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025@netconsultings.com> wrote:

> Not true.
> This is the case only in fixed pipelines.

Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think
of platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1)
and MX Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS
isn't expensive at all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the
memory.

--
++ytti
RE: Mx204 alternative [ In reply to ]
> From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 1:38 PM
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:10, <adamv0025@netconsultings.com> wrote:
>
> > Not true.
> > This is the case only in fixed pipelines.
>
> Also true in say MX Trio and ASR9k EZchip, I can't immediately think of
> platform where ACL or QoS costs pps. ASR9k is TCAM for ACL so O(1) and MX
> Trio is just fast enough to not affect pps performance. QoS isn't expensive at
> all in lookup terms, just expensive to have the memory.
>
I'm afraid I'd have to disagree.

adam

1 2 3 4  View All