Mailing List Archive

MythTV 0.21
It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
homepage, anybody install it yet?

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ed Brandon <bigeb@ebnet.us> wrote:

> It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
> homepage, anybody install it yet?
>
> _______________________________________________
>

I can't think of a better way to spend a Saturday night! Off to format and
reload the dev box!
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On 09/03/2008, Matt Emmott <memmott@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ed Brandon <bigeb@ebnet.us> wrote:
> > It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
> > homepage, anybody install it yet?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
>
> I can't think of a better way to spend a Saturday night! Off to format and
> reload the dev box!

Format and reload!? This isn't Windows you know :)

--
Nick Morrott

MythTV Official wiki:
http://mythtv.org/wiki/
MythTV users list archive:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users

"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mario Limonciello
<mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ed Brandon wrote:
> > It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
> > homepage, anybody install it yet?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mythtv-users mailing list
> > mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> Builds are available in Ubuntu Hardy. They will temporarily be available on the
> gutsy mythbuntu-trunk ppa (until the formal backport goes through)


What about mythbuntu "weekly fixes'" ?

Since mythbuntu has gone official I've been a bit confused. I have
gutsy, and mythbuntu installed on top, and the weekly fixes URL in my
sources.list, but I never get myth updates.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Mario Limonciello
<mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bill Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mario Limonciello
> > <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > What about mythbuntu "weekly fixes'" ?
> >
> > Since mythbuntu has gone official I've been a bit confused. I have
> > gutsy, and mythbuntu installed on top, and the weekly fixes URL in my
> > sources.list, but I never get myth updates.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mythtv-users mailing list
> > mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> As expected this is going to be a source of confusion.
>
> There has to be a balance chosen. Yes 0.21-fixes is a fixes branch, but 0.20.2
> shipped with 7.10. It's either force everyone using that branch to switch to
> 0.21, or let them stay on a "stable" 0.20.2.
>
> There have been no updates to the "fixes" branch because nothing has been
> committed to 0.20.2. It seemed silly to keep pushing updates when the focus was
> only on 0.21 for the last few weeks.
>
> So here is the entire plan for 0.21+:
>
> 1) Get it in hardy (done)
> 2) Get it on the mythbuntu-trunk branch so that people on 0.20.2 who were using
> the -fixes branch don't need to switch
> 3) Get an official backport into gutsy backports
> 4) Once this backport is active, the mythbuntu-trunk branch will start to track
> trunk again
> 5) No more -fixes for the rest of gutsy.
> 6) -fixes will resume for hardy with release-0-21-fixes.
>
> That sound sane?


It seems sane, and I can see how/why you're doing it that way. I'm
not very keen on the backports (perhaps just from being burned by
debian, maybe not rational?) repository... is there an easy way for
someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
.21?

The way I see it my options are
-wait until 8.04
-download the files from the backports repo and install them manually
-play with pinning and prios so that backports will be in my system,
but NOTHING non-myth will be installed from it

Is #3 my winner? If so, does anyone know enough about apt pinning to
help me make a config that will work?
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On 03/08/2008 09:03 PM, Nick Morrott wrote:
> On 09/03/2008, Matt Emmott <memmott@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ed Brandon <bigeb@ebnet.us> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
>>> homepage, anybody install it yet?
>> I can't think of a better way to spend a Saturday night! Off to format and
>> reload the dev box!
> Format and reload!? This isn't Windows you know :)

Cleanliness is next to ...

It's no different from how I clean my house--I burn it down, then
rebuild it. ;)

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Ed Brandon wrote:
> It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
> homepage, anybody install it yet?
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Builds are available in Ubuntu Hardy. They will temporarily be available on the
gutsy mythbuntu-trunk ppa (until the formal backport goes through)


--
Mario Limonciello
mario.mailing@gmail.com
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Bill Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mario Limonciello
> <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> What about mythbuntu "weekly fixes'" ?
>
> Since mythbuntu has gone official I've been a bit confused. I have
> gutsy, and mythbuntu installed on top, and the weekly fixes URL in my
> sources.list, but I never get myth updates.
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
As expected this is going to be a source of confusion.

There has to be a balance chosen. Yes 0.21-fixes is a fixes branch, but 0.20.2
shipped with 7.10. It's either force everyone using that branch to switch to
0.21, or let them stay on a "stable" 0.20.2.

There have been no updates to the "fixes" branch because nothing has been
committed to 0.20.2. It seemed silly to keep pushing updates when the focus was
only on 0.21 for the last few weeks.

So here is the entire plan for 0.21+:

1) Get it in hardy (done)
2) Get it on the mythbuntu-trunk branch so that people on 0.20.2 who were using
the -fixes branch don't need to switch
3) Get an official backport into gutsy backports
4) Once this backport is active, the mythbuntu-trunk branch will start to track
trunk again
5) No more -fixes for the rest of gutsy.
6) -fixes will resume for hardy with release-0-21-fixes.

That sound sane?
--
Mario Limonciello
mario.mailing@gmail.com
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Bill Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Mario Limonciello
> <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> It seems sane, and I can see how/why you're doing it that way. I'm
> not very keen on the backports (perhaps just from being burned by
> debian, maybe not rational?) repository... is there an easy way for
> someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
> .21?
>
> The way I see it my options are
> -wait until 8.04
> -download the files from the backports repo and install them manually
> -play with pinning and prios so that backports will be in my system,
> but NOTHING non-myth will be installed from it
>
> Is #3 my winner? If so, does anyone know enough about apt pinning to
> help me make a config that will work?
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Well the way you should do is this:

1) Activate trunk or backports (your choice on this one)
2) Install *just* the changed mythtv things.
3) Deactivate the repo

You won't have to mess with pinning or anything then. You will get just new
myth builds and nothing more. The versions are all greater than stuff in the
archive, so you won't have to pin anything.

--
Mario Limonciello
mario.mailing@gmail.com
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
> It looks like .21 has officially been released according to the
> homepage, anybody install it yet?
>

I have been using 0.21 SVN for over 1 year so I will be in no great
rush to upgrade to any official package anytime soon. I may however
upgrade my svn version from 15448 to the current but I hear just
before the release there was a great deal of development that
destabilized the trunk build so I am going to wait a while till the
SVN code returns to its stable ways.

John
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 15:28 +1100, Bill Williamson wrote:
>
> It seems sane, and I can see how/why you're doing it that way. I'm
> not very keen on the backports (perhaps just from being burned by
> debian, maybe not rational?) repository...


The Ubuntu backports always worked fine for me.

They are managed differently than the Debian backports. Debian's are an
slightly unofficial thing, whereas Ubuntu's are managed like the rest.


> is there an easy way for
> someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
> .21?

Mythbuntu *is* Ubuntu.

It is a set of packages inside the Ubuntu repos, nothing more.

Eventually you can add the -fixes mythbuntu repo, or the -trunk repo.



>
> The way I see it my options are
> -wait until 8.04
> -download the files from the backports repo and install them manually
> -play with pinning and prios so that backports will be in my system,
> but NOTHING non-myth will be installed from it
>
> Is #3 my winner? If so, does anyone know enough about apt pinning to
> help me make a config that will work?


I would say that the options are:

- wait for 8.04
- use the backport when it is available, using the repo normally

# Backports
deb http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-backports main restricted
universe multiverse

I see no reason to go manual or play with pinning.

Nico

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:46 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Builds are available in Ubuntu Hardy. They will temporarily be
> available on the
> gutsy mythbuntu-trunk ppa

http://ppa.launchpad.net/mythbuntu-trunk/ ?



> (until the formal backport goes through)

When is this expected? (no hard date asked, just a ballpark figure)



Are there things to know/do before/when the update is done when on
Gutsy?



Thanks for being so ready at release time!

Nico

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 00:56 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Nicolas Will wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:46 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> >
> > http://ppa.launchpad.net/mythbuntu-trunk/ ?
> >
> >
> Yes. This is where packages are built that end up on the trunk weekly
> build
> repository.
> >
> >
> > When is this expected? (no hard date asked, just a ballpark figure)
> >
>
> A few days. All the paper work is filed, so its just a matter of an
> archive
> administrator copying the source packages over to the gutsy backports
> repository.


I'll wait, then, no point in rushing if it's going to come through
natural paths.



> >
> >
> > Are there things to know/do before/when the update is done when on
> > Gutsy?
> >
> Hopefully not.. There were complications that would have been
> involved, but
> those should be covered by the packaging.
>

Great.

I'll have backups of my conf file, though!



A last note, my tables are in latin1_swedish, and that messes up the
French stuff in the Listings, is there any utf8 stuff coming with 0.21?

Thanks for your reply.

Nico

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Nicolas Will wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:46 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/mythbuntu-trunk/ ?
>
>
Yes. This is where packages are built that end up on the trunk weekly build
repository.
>
>
> When is this expected? (no hard date asked, just a ballpark figure)
>

A few days. All the paper work is filed, so its just a matter of an archive
administrator copying the source packages over to the gutsy backports repository.
>
>
> Are there things to know/do before/when the update is done when on
> Gutsy?
>
Hopefully not.. There were complications that would have been involved, but
those should be covered by the packaging.

--
Mario Limonciello
mario.mailing@gmail.com
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Bill Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mario Limonciello
>> <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What about mythbuntu "weekly fixes'" ?
>>
>> Since mythbuntu has gone official I've been a bit confused. I have
>> gutsy, and mythbuntu installed on top, and the weekly fixes URL in my
>> sources.list, but I never get myth updates.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mythtv-users mailing list
>> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
>> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>>
> As expected this is going to be a source of confusion.
>
> There has to be a balance chosen. Yes 0.21-fixes is a fixes branch, but 0.20.2
> shipped with 7.10. It's either force everyone using that branch to switch to
> 0.21, or let them stay on a "stable" 0.20.2.
>
> There have been no updates to the "fixes" branch because nothing has been
> committed to 0.20.2. It seemed silly to keep pushing updates when the focus was
> only on 0.21 for the last few weeks.
>
> So here is the entire plan for 0.21+:
>
> 1) Get it in hardy (done)
> 2) Get it on the mythbuntu-trunk branch so that people on 0.20.2 who were using
> the -fixes branch don't need to switch
> 3) Get an official backport into gutsy backports
> 4) Once this backport is active, the mythbuntu-trunk branch will start to track
> trunk again
> 5) No more -fixes for the rest of gutsy.
> 6) -fixes will resume for hardy with release-0-21-fixes.
>
> That sound sane?
>
>
I have to ask.... why are you creating a version of 8.04 when 7.10 is
listed as the latest on ubunutu.com?

Cheers
Bruce
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Nicolas Will <nico@youplala.net> wrote:
> > is there an easy way for
> > someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
> > .21?
>
> Mythbuntu *is* Ubuntu.
>
> It is a set of packages inside the Ubuntu repos, nothing more.
>
> Eventually you can add the -fixes mythbuntu repo, or the -trunk repo.

Thanks for the other comments, very helpful... I may give backports a go.

However, Mythbuntu is not ubuntu if you're on the -fixes repo. I have
a non-ubuntu source in my sources.list with a non-ubuntu key signing
the packages in order to run current mythbuntu. This is not a
complaint, but I still see mythbuntu as something seperate from "base
base" ubuntu + myth packages.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Michael T. Dean wrote:
> On 03/08/2008 09:03 PM, Nick Morrott wrote:
>> Format and reload!? This isn't Windows you know :)
>
> Cleanliness is next to ...
>
> It's no different from how I clean my house--I burn it down, then
> rebuild it. ;)
>

That's ok, most of us minimyth users do that every time we reboot our
front ends! ;)
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Bruce Nordstrand wrote:
>
> Mario Limonciello wrote:
> I have to ask.... why are you creating a version of 8.04 when 7.10 is
> listed as the latest on ubunutu.com?
>
> Cheers
> Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Bruce,

The way that the Ubuntu development cycle works, there is always a new release
every 6 months to refresh versions and add new features. 8.04 is the next
release, and as you may expect, developing it does take some time.

--
Mario Limonciello
mario.mailing@gmail.com
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Richard Freeman wrote:
> Michael T. Dean wrote:
>> On 03/08/2008 09:03 PM, Nick Morrott wrote:
>>> Format and reload!? This isn't Windows you know :)
>> Cleanliness is next to ...
>>
>> It's no different from how I clean my house--I burn it down, then
>> rebuild it. ;)
>>
>
> That's ok, most of us minimyth users do that every time we reboot our
> front ends! ;)

Speaking of MiniMyth. If you want to give 0.21 a try, I have uploaded a
test build of MiniMyth with 0.21. However, if you are running 0.20 right
now, then try the latest 0.20 test build. If the 0.20 test build works
without problems, then try the 0.21 test build. That way you can be more
certain that the changes in MiniMyth 41b3 (e.g. the use of GCC 4.3) are
not a problem on your system.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Bruce Nordstrand wrote:
>
>> Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> I have to ask.... why are you creating a version of 8.04 when 7.10 is
>> listed as the latest on ubunutu.com?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Bruce
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
> Bruce,
>
> The way that the Ubuntu development cycle works, there is always a new release
> every 6 months to refresh versions and add new features. 8.04 is the next
> release, and as you may expect, developing it does take some time.
>
Thanks Mario

Looks like I will be taking another route with Myth in that case. 7.10
has been troublesome enough, 8.04 probably won't be any better. Time to
dust off the Edgy install and look for alternatives...

Cheers
Bruce
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:28:54PM +1100, Bill Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Mario Limonciello
> <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Bill Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mario Limonciello
> > > <mario.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > What about mythbuntu "weekly fixes'" ?
> > >
> > > Since mythbuntu has gone official I've been a bit confused. I have
> > > gutsy, and mythbuntu installed on top, and the weekly fixes URL in my
> > > sources.list, but I never get myth updates.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mythtv-users mailing list
> > > mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> > > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
> > As expected this is going to be a source of confusion.
> >
> > There has to be a balance chosen. Yes 0.21-fixes is a fixes branch, but 0.20.2
> > shipped with 7.10. It's either force everyone using that branch to switch to
> > 0.21, or let them stay on a "stable" 0.20.2.
> >
> > There have been no updates to the "fixes" branch because nothing has been
> > committed to 0.20.2. It seemed silly to keep pushing updates when the focus was
> > only on 0.21 for the last few weeks.
> >
> > So here is the entire plan for 0.21+:
> >
> > 1) Get it in hardy (done)
> > 2) Get it on the mythbuntu-trunk branch so that people on 0.20.2 who were using
> > the -fixes branch don't need to switch
> > 3) Get an official backport into gutsy backports
> > 4) Once this backport is active, the mythbuntu-trunk branch will start to track
> > trunk again
> > 5) No more -fixes for the rest of gutsy.
> > 6) -fixes will resume for hardy with release-0-21-fixes.
> >
> > That sound sane?
>
>
> It seems sane, and I can see how/why you're doing it that way. I'm
> not very keen on the backports (perhaps just from being burned by
> debian, maybe not rational?) repository... is there an easy way for
> someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
> .21?
>
> The way I see it my options are
> -wait until 8.04
> -download the files from the backports repo and install them manually
> -play with pinning and prios so that backports will be in my system,
> but NOTHING non-myth will be installed from it

--- My personal favorite: Just get the source tarball and build it.

Interestingly enough, with my last Gutsy frontend install I thought
I was finally going to start getting away from building my own sources.

...ohwellsomuchforthatidea

>
> Is #3 my winner? If so, does anyone know enough about apt pinning to
> help me make a config that will work?
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bill Williamson <bill@bbqninja.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Nicolas Will <nico@youplala.net> wrote:
> > > is there an easy way for
> > > someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" + mythbuntu to get
> > > .21?
> >
> > Mythbuntu *is* Ubuntu.
> >
> > It is a set of packages inside the Ubuntu repos, nothing more.
> >
> > Eventually you can add the -fixes mythbuntu repo, or the -trunk repo.
>
> Thanks for the other comments, very helpful... I may give backports a go.
>
> However, Mythbuntu is not ubuntu if you're on the -fixes repo. I have
> a non-ubuntu source in my sources.list with a non-ubuntu key signing
> the packages in order to run current mythbuntu. This is not a
> complaint, but I still see mythbuntu as something seperate from "base
> base" ubuntu + myth packages.
>

If you wont complain then I will. I use Ubuntu because I don't want to run
an unstable, cobbled together OS. Unfortunately Mythbuntu is an unstable
cobbled together mess. It is embarrassing that mythbuntu is the official
face of MythTV on Ubuntu.

--
_____________
Ryan Patterson
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:27 -0400, ryan patterson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Bill Williamson <bill@bbqninja.com>
> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Nicolas Will
> <nico@youplala.net> wrote:
> > > is there an easy way for
> > > someone like me running a stock ubuntu "current" +
> mythbuntu to get
> > > .21?
> >
> > Mythbuntu *is* Ubuntu.
> >
> > It is a set of packages inside the Ubuntu repos, nothing
> more.
> >
> > Eventually you can add the -fixes mythbuntu repo, or the
> -trunk repo.
>
>
> Thanks for the other comments, very helpful... I may give
> backports a go.
>
> However, Mythbuntu is not ubuntu if you're on the -fixes
> repo. I have
> a non-ubuntu source in my sources.list with a non-ubuntu key
> signing
> the packages in order to run current mythbuntu. This is not a
> complaint, but I still see mythbuntu as something seperate
> from "base
> base" ubuntu + myth packages.
>
>
> If you wont complain then I will. I use Ubuntu because I don't want
> to run an unstable, cobbled together OS. Unfortunately Mythbuntu is
> an unstable cobbled together mess. It is embarrassing that mythbuntu
> is the official face of MythTV on Ubuntu.


I fail to understand all the fuss.

You want MythTV on Ubuntu? fine, get all the necessary stuff straight
from the Ubuntu repositories, including the Mythbuntu Control Center.
Get an upgrade every 6 months in the worst case, sooner if the new
release is considered for the official Ubuntu backports repository (and
it is).

You want to have the latest and greatest -fixes for the current release?
Fine by me. unfortunately, the Ubuntu release cycle and processes will
not allow frequent updates like that from their repositories. Oh wait!
The Mythbuntu guys are good enough and provide a repository with the
latest -fixes builds, following exactly the same process used for the
official release (using PPA, an official Ubuntu tool, for the in-between
release building). You will get something that you can trust and that
will not break your upgrade cycle with the new official releases when
they come up.

You want the latest and greatest -trunk? Also fine by me. Same remarks
about its availability inside the official repositories. Oh wait! The
Mythbuntu guys are good enough and provide a repository with the latest
-fixes builds, following exactly the same process used for the official
release (using PPA, an official Ubuntu tool, for the in-between release
building). You will get something that you can trust and that will not
break your upgrade cycle with the new official releases when they come
up. When 0.21 was released, we had access to the packages merely hours
later, if not minutes, not just for the next stable release, but also
built for the current stable. And you can still trust that nothing will
break.

I think we are quite lucky to have access to all those choices, all
provided by the same set of people, which creates a seamless integration
between the various choices offered (stable, -fixes and -trunk).

On top of this they do provide an extra level of nice tools like MCC,
the remote control stuff, the dedicated install process and the live CD
frontend. My opinion is that this is quite a value add on top of just
packaging.

Finally, my experience with the Mythbuntu team with regards to support,
debugging and fixing has been quite stellar.

I've been known to be ignorant and wrong, but I can understand good
arguments. My view of the situation is quite positive. Show me the dark
side, please.

Until then, you can safely consider me as a fan-boy.

[.insert distro war disclaimer here - I do not judge other distros or
consider Mythbuntu better or worse than X, Y and Z by plain lack of
experience with said X, Y and Z]

Nico / camelreef on #ubuntu-mythtv
just a user
http://www.youplala.net/linux/home-theater-pc

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
Nicolas Will schreef op 10-3-2008 15:00:
SNIP...
> I fail to understand all the fuss.
>
> You want MythTV on Ubuntu? fine, get all the necessary stuff straight
> from the Ubuntu repositories, including the Mythbuntu Control Center.
> Get an upgrade every 6 months in the worst case, sooner if the new
> release is considered for the official Ubuntu backports repository (and
> it is).
>
> You want to have the latest and greatest -fixes for the current release?
> Fine by me. unfortunately, the Ubuntu release cycle and processes will
> not allow frequent updates like that from their repositories. Oh wait!
> The Mythbuntu guys are good enough and provide a repository with the
> latest -fixes builds, following exactly the same process used for the
> official release (using PPA, an official Ubuntu tool, for the in-between
> release building). You will get something that you can trust and that
> will not break your upgrade cycle with the new official releases when
> they come up.
>
> You want the latest and greatest -trunk? Also fine by me. Same remarks
> about its availability inside the official repositories. Oh wait! The
> Mythbuntu guys are good enough and provide a repository with the latest
> -fixes builds, following exactly the same process used for the official
> release (using PPA, an official Ubuntu tool, for the in-between release
> building). You will get something that you can trust and that will not
> break your upgrade cycle with the new official releases when they come
> up. When 0.21 was released, we had access to the packages merely hours
> later, if not minutes, not just for the next stable release, but also
> built for the current stable. And you can still trust that nothing will
> break.
>
> I think we are quite lucky to have access to all those choices, all
> provided by the same set of people, which creates a seamless integration
> between the various choices offered (stable, -fixes and -trunk).
>
> On top of this they do provide an extra level of nice tools like MCC,
> the remote control stuff, the dedicated install process and the live CD
> frontend. My opinion is that this is quite a value add on top of just
> packaging.
>
> Finally, my experience with the Mythbuntu team with regards to support,
> debugging and fixing has been quite stellar.
>
> I've been known to be ignorant and wrong, but I can understand good
> arguments. My view of the situation is quite positive. Show me the dark
> side, please.
>
> Until then, you can safely consider me as a fan-boy.
>
> [.insert distro war disclaimer here - I do not judge other distros or
> consider Mythbuntu better or worse than X, Y and Z by plain lack of
> experience with said X, Y and Z]
>
> Nico / camelreef on #ubuntu-mythtv
> just a user
> http://www.youplala.net/linux/home-theater-pc

Ok, not getting in the n^n distrowar: Is 21 available for gutsy and do I
have to change something in the repodata to enable?
Then I can upgrade my fedora and ubuntu-systems ;)

Regards,

Jos(just a user as well)
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Re: MythTV 0.21 [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 15:31 +0100, Jos Hoekstra wrote:
> Ok, not getting in the n^n distrowar: Is 21 available for gutsy

Yes, I run it on gutsy.

> and do I
> have to change something in the repodata to enable?

Two choices:

* use the official gutsy backport repo from Ubuntu (turn it on
using Synaptic, for example) and wait for a few days

https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythbuntu/+bug/200044

* use the -trunk weekly build from mythbuntu that is held at the
0.21 release for the time being, until the backport kicks in
IIRC

http://www.mythbuntu.org/auto-builds

Nico

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

1 2  View All