Mailing List Archive

Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20.pdf
> -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>

> -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>

> -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>

> -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>

...

Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here. Also I think
there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
have to search for that discussion later.

-Brian
Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20.pdf [ In reply to ]
Brian M Dube wrote:
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> > +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>
>
> ...
>
> Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here.

I was wondering about that. This is in the projectInfo plugin.
Perhaps use the release version number instead.

> Also I think
> there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
> have to search for that discussion later.

Yes, that would be good.

-David