Mailing List Archive

LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?
Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:

<note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be changed from
the default. Also, you can't set this higher than 8190 without
modifying the source code and rebuilding.</note>

I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was removed in
r149269. No?

--
Bojan
Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value? [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
>
> <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be changed from
> the default. Also, you can't set this higher than 8190 without
> modifying the source code and rebuilding.</note>
>
> I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was removed in
> r149269. No?

So, nobody will mind if I remove that comment from the docs then? I
think I have commit there, although never really tried...

--
Bojan
Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value? [ In reply to ]
On Friday 22 June 2012, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
> > <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be
> > changed from the default. Also, you can't set this higher
> > than 8190 without modifying the source code and
> > rebuilding.</note>
> >
> > I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was
> > removed in r149269. No?
>
> So, nobody will mind if I remove that comment from the docs then? I
> think I have commit there, although never really tried...

Fixed, thanks.
Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value? [ In reply to ]
Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de> wrote:

>Fixed, thanks.

Thanks.

--
Bojan